The so-called "AI photos" generated by small programs have become a popular trend. This kind of stuff usually promotes "generating exclusive artistic photos with one click". However, the issues behind it, including technology, copyright and data security, are covered up by hot words. We are not going to talk about those vain things today, but directly cut into a few issues that make users most concerned about their hearts and minds.
Does Source Code Home’s mini-program AI photo-taking involve privacy leaks?
Most AI photo generation services on the market currently require users to upload multiple clear photos of faces. After these photos are uploaded to the server, their purpose and storage period are often unclear. Although the developers claim to "protect privacy," there may be a clause in the user agreement that allows the other party to use the portrait for model training. Not long ago, Several incidents involving UNIQLO being accused of "secretly photographing" consumers have triggered widespread concerns about privacy in public places. The risks we face when we actively upload personal biometric information online cannot be underestimated. Once data is leaked or used inappropriately, the consequences are more serious than the loss of an ordinary photo.
Who owns the quality and copyright of the AI photo source code?
Platforms such as "Source Code Home" often provide encapsulated basic functional modules. The photo effects they generate are highly dependent on the training data of the underlying AI model. If the training data itself covers unauthorized portraits or works of art, then the generated results may involve infringement. The copyright ownership of the "unique" photos that users spend time generating may also be unclear. The platform may use clauses to declare that it has the right to use it, just like this. The "big-name goods" you buy may have been worn by others and look very glamorous, but there are doubts about their origin and ownership. What the user ultimately obtains is probably just a digital image file with legal risks.
How to treat small programs such as AI photo-taking rationally
The focus is to lower expectations and clearly understand its entertainment nature. They cannot replace photography in the professional sense, and they run the risk of creating scenes that tend to look exactly the same and that don't match the original. Be sure to read them carefully before using them, especially the relevant provisions regarding data deletion. At the same time, we might as well turn our attention to the technological application aspect that develops in a wider scope. For example, in recent times. Heavy! The news of the birth of the world's first 2nm mobile phone chip conveys that future mobile devices will have a leap in local AI computing capabilities. Maybe one day, a true "offline AI photo" can be realized with full privacy protection. The technology itself is impartial, but the way it is applied determines its value.
Have you ever thought about it, when you experience such a novel small program, would you be willing to exchange your personal and clear biological information (such as facial photos) for a set of AI-generated pictures that may not be unique? You are welcome to share your opinions and concerns in the comment area. If you feel that this article has prompted you, please give it a like and support it.
