As a parent who is concerned about children's programming education, I have come into contact with many programming training institutions, and Source Code Bear Children's Programming is one of them that I have carefully inspected. In my opinion, the course system of Source Code Bear is relatively complete, focusing on the transition from graphical programming to languages such as Python. However, the actual effect needs to be analyzed in conjunction with specific details. Next, I will start with a few issues that parents are most concerned about and share my observations and opinions.
Is the Source Code Bear children’s programming course suitable for children with no basic knowledge?
Source Code Bear introductory courses often use graphical tools such as Scratch, which is very friendly to children with no programming foundation. My child has just started learning and can complete simple animations by dragging building blocks. It is easy to get started. However, although the zero-based courses are easy to get started, the progress may be slow. If the child has a certain foundation, the content may be repetitive. It is recommended that parents choose the appropriate level based on the child's interest and acceptance level to avoid wasting time and money.
How to evaluate the effectiveness of Source Code Bear programming teaching
Improving children's actual abilities is the main manifestation of teaching effectiveness, such as whether children can independently complete small projects or solve simple problems. Source Code Bear uses project-based learning to enable children to master logical thinking while making games or applications. However, the effectiveness evaluation cannot only look at classroom performance, but also needs to look at long-term application. For example, I noticed that some children can design small programs on their own after learning, but there are also some children who only imitate mechanically and lack innovation. Parents can pay more attention to their children's works and teacher feedback, and comprehensively judge the progress.
Are the teachers and fees at Source Code Bear reasonable?
In terms of teachers, Yuanma Xiong claims that the teachers have professional backgrounds, but the actual standards may vary. I met a teacher who was very good at guiding children to think, but some parents reported that some teachers lacked experience. In terms of fees, Yuanma Xiong’s course fees are at a medium level in the industry. However, institutions such as Fat Dong Lai Open Day have recently caused controversy due to their high prices, which reminds us to look at cost-effectiveness rationally. It is recommended that parents participate in auditions and compare when making choices to ensure that money is spent on key areas.
Source Code Bear's children's programming has certain advantages in the enlightenment period. However, parents have to make decisions based on the actual situation of their children and the cost of teachers. When choosing a programming institution, what aspects do you value most? You are welcome to share your experience in the comment area. If you find this article useful, please like it to support it!
